“The value of a majority lies not in the chance to wield great power, but in the chance to use limited power to do great things.” – John Boehner (R-OH-08) Remarks on the House Floor, January 4, 2007
As the 2010 election season was coming to an end, Mr. Boehner introduced his “Pillars of a New Majority”. In it Mr. Boehner made some interesting observations :
Leaders overreach because the rules allow them to.
Legislators duck their responsibilities because the rules help them to. And when the rules don’t suit the majority’s purposes, they are just ignored.
Without transparency, lawmakers cannot hold each other accountable, and the American people cannot hold us to account.
That’s why in the Pledge to America we say that the text of all bills should be published online for at least three days before coming up for a vote. No exceptions. No excuses.
But this lack of transparency speaks to a larger problem where the Speaker’s office has the capacity to unilaterally draft a bill and send it straight through to the Rules Committee.
Because the truth is, much of the work of committees has been co-opted by the leadership. In too many instances, we no longer have legislators; we just have voters. In my view, if we want to make legislators legislate again, then we need to empower them at the committee level.
When the Republicans took charge of the House, new House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA-07) introduced a rules package that covers scheduling (how many days worked, when votes can and cannot occur), the terms and conditions for debating bills (all bills will cite their constitutional authority and be posted online for 72 hours before a vote).
Well …. the Pillars are crumbling … forget getting committees involved, forget the online posting for three days, Let’s Just Vote.
Heck, ignore the Constitution, Let’s Just Vote.
Case In Point : HR 1255 “Government Shutdown Prevention Act”
The bill was introduced on March 30, 2011, by Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR-03) and referred to the Committee on Appropriations, as well as the committees on Oversight and Government Reform, House Administration, and Budget.
On April 1st after the morning prayer, Pledge of Allegiance and a few speeches, at 9:15 AM, the first order of business was from Mr. Woodall who moved to consider the resolution.. In case you were wondering, HR 1255 never got a hearing in the assigned committees … just a quick review by the Rules Committee where the most powerful woman in the House pushed it through.
HR 1255 may be called the “Government Shutdown Prevention Act” but it’s real intention is to “Deem and Pass” HR 1 -Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 if the Senate does not act by April 6th … remember when “Deem and Pass” brought such anger when it was discussed during the Healthcare Reform debate which John Kline (R-MN-02) remarked “It’s incredible to even think about it.”
… well, it’s a new Majority … no worry but heck, that’s the way the Republicans managed the House when they were in the Majority in 2006 when Mr. Kline voted for “Deem and Pass” legislation.
While the Senate has held two parliamentarian votes on HR 1, they have not formally acted on it. Obviously, that creates a constitutional question … remember Joe Wilson (R-SC-02) reading Art. I, section 7, clause 2 when the new Congress started ?
“Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate shall, before it become a law, be presented to the President of the United States. If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his objections to that House in which it shall have originated who shall enter the objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it.”
So much for the adhering to the Constitution … and the question of the constitutionality of Mr. Womack’s legislation was the source of much of the debate that followed … including by Republican Louie Gohmert (R-TX-01) : “We’re here because the Democratic majority last year did not do their job, did not give us a budget, did not due proper appropriations, and now the Senate has had the same problem. So I applaud anybody’s efforts in trying to move the ball down the road so that we can appropriate. I just wish the Senate would do their job now and take care of it. But for a bill to say provisions that pass the House are hereby enacted into law violates my conscience and the Constitution. I cannot vote for it.”
Mr. Gohmert was true to his word and voted against it … but Mr. Cantor and Mr. Kline voted to approve it.
The Pillars are crumbling upon those that established them.
Mr. Boehner, Cantor and Kline are experienced legislators … they implied things were going to be different …. but instead they allowed a freshman Representative to promote faulty legislation that even the GOP statement on the bill says as much “As with any law, the provisions of H.R. 1255 would only take effect if the bill were approved by the Senate and signed by the president.”
What a waste of precious time that could otherwise be used to negotiate with the Senate and White House in an effort to keep Government operating.

“The value of a majority lies not in the chance to wield great power, but in the chance to use limited power to do great things.” – John Boehner (R-OH-08) Remarks on the House Floor, January 4, 2007
That must be code for: I see where you could have taken advantage. Hmm. How do we learn from that, or do we want to learn? Good government serves, but ultimately government is us. Are we good women and men? And does that matter, anymore?
Minnesota is gearing for a shutdown. I’ve heard talk of the House version in the case a Senate version doesn’t get produced… etc. But there’s still the veto, right? Or do I show my ignorance? What about line item veto and write your own thing in? I think I remember King Pawlenty doing that. Should Dayton learn from that, and do it? And bring on those Constitutional votes, Republicans.
THANKS for reading my commentary and your observations.
The key to the Boehner quote is the date … on January 4, 2007, he handed the gavel to Nancy Pelosi, so I interpret the comment as a warning to the Democratic majority … and that what makes the comment so applicable today … the Republicans are now the majority, and are violating the principles that they advocated when they were in the minority.
BTW, there is a second commentary concerning HR 1255 “Government Shutdown Prevention Act” on my MinnesotaCentral.blogspot.com site … that refers to John Kline (R-MN-02) misleading press release about Congressional pay. It’s a carefully worded PR … but he fails to mention that Tim Walz (D-MN-01) offered an amendment that would bar retroactive reimbursement after the government resolves the budget issue … Kline’s PR is a cruel April Fools joke for his constituents … especially when you realize how much he awarded his staff in bonuses after November’s election.
In Minnesota, I see a MN-GOP party that is obsessed with reducing taxes … it’s not about cutting spending, it’s about reducing taxes … or why would they advocate a property tax system where business would not pay a dime ? BTW, do you agree that the cuts in LGA are impacting this … think about it … there is a manufacturing plant with a valuation in the millions and that amount is in the “tax base pool” along with all the homes … when LGA gets cut, the “tax revenues pool” has to be adjusted – either cut spending for police or ask every property owner to pay a little more … now when your home has a valuation of $100,000 with a property tax payment of $900, but then because of LGA cuts, the tax payment is raised 5% … it’s 45 bucks, yah, your not happy, but what are you gonna do (plus you might be eligible for some sorta property tax refund) … now think about the large manufacturing facility and how much that LGA cut impacts their property taxes.
The problem that I foresee for Governor Dayton is that he does not have a partner in the MN-GOP that will advocate for compromise … it takes leadership … someone that realizes that the citizens and state are better off when the parties work together.
My wishful thinking?
Dayton is again pushing the bonding bill,
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2011/03/29/dayton-labor-rally-bonding-bill
which would provide immediate relief for working families. I think I also read there’s 100M for higher ed in there? Originally, Larry Howes agreed to sponsor the bill. Perhaps Larry (now that he’s given up on attacking Democrats for the idea to renovate Como Zoo) will see how dangerous an all cuts budget is and use his position as bonding dude to ally w Dayton. Yes?
Larry Howes as sponsor: http://ellenanderson.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=55:week-in-review-for-february-18-2011-&catid=3:all
[...] Reforming Congress, Repealing and Replacing The Job-Killing Health Care Law … based on the Pillars of a New Majority ? Thus far, ZERO accomplishments … the debt ceiling issue needs to be resolved but the House is [...]
[...] Pillars of a New Majority as the “bible” of how the House would operate … in April it was noted that the pillars were [...]
[...] 43 co-sponsors of HALT are proof of the Do-Nothing Congress and not the Pillars of a New Majority promoted by Speaker John Boehner (R-OH-08). Mr. Smith has already had one hearing on this proposal [...]
I’m surprised, MN Central, that Boehner and his partisans waited as long as they did before violating those rules.
I wish that the more widely reaching media would make a note of that. The right are imploding.
[...] Reading the proposal, I saw some factual errors but since Speaker John Boehner (R-OH-08) promised an open, Committee-lead House under his “Pillars of a New Majority” program, I decided that [...]
[...] when John Boehner announced his Pillars of a New Majority pledging for more involvement at the committee level and adequate time to read legislation prior to [...]
[...] those Pillars have crumbled. Compromise is hardly necessary when Republicans dominate committees (the Republicans have an eight [...]
[...] flood insurance, and other programs. Yep, just another example of the Pillars of a New Majority crumbling as Speaker Boehner pledge to end these “catch-all” [...]
[...] the Pillars of a New Majority have crumbled. Taxpayers paid Members of Congress a base salary of $174,000 … and they “worked” less than [...]
[...] Speaker Boehner had a great plan, but Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s actions have resulted in those pillars crumbling (again). [...]
[...] of his Pledge to America that would produce a new way of legislating. For example, Speaker Boehner said : In too many instances, we no longer have legislators; we just have voters. In my view, if we want [...]