It hasn’t been long since sex educator Margaret Sanger broke the law by informing others about contraceptives or long since we avoided public scrutiny by secretly shipping unwed pregnant mothers off to maternity homes . Women can now keep their jobs throughout pregnancy, have control over their own bodies, and even (if they want) show their bellies while being pregnant. Because restrictions have been removed, pregnancy and the fear of pregnancy has now been replaced by a freedom to work, plan for babies, the survival of single mothers and fathers, and even the ability of women to enjoy sex without worry.
All of this might soon change for Mississippi women if Initiative 26 passes this November. Not in November, 1960, or in November, 1920, but in November, 2011. If this amendment passes, raped women would be mandated to carry babies. If this amendment passes, women could be imprisoned in order to ensure a successful birth (or because the woman didn’t ensure birth). In certain situations, doctors would even be at a loss to save a woman’s life. Some women will have many more children than they can feed. Last and probably least, many women will feel uneasy having sex.
If this Initiative passes, I vote for accompanying laws. I propose Mississippians ensure families needing help feeding their children have access to free food, health care, and general sustenance. Instead of taking from the educational system or not ensuring our safety because there’s no money, this should be funded by an increase in taxes which are specifically earmarked to avoid abortion. Mississippi doctors should be allowed to save women in crisis. And for every woman that is raped andtherefore becomes pregnant, I like the idea of choosing from one male from the Mississippi population, of both the rich and the poor and in a random drawing, and mandating he wear a sympathy belly for nine months.
It’s easy to see how this Initiative might pass. People don’t want to be baby killers or vote to allow others to be baby killers. If Mississippi passes Intiative 26 and prosecuting for abortion happens, and Mississippians decide the life of a woman isn’t worth saving, Mississippi should increase the penalty for rape to death (just because men should die, too, perhaps.)
Since the affluent will probablystill find a way to end pregnancies, impoverished people will feel the weight of pregnancy more– and the gap between the po0r and rich will further widen.
Talking about “women’s rights” seems so cold compared to talking about freedom, and I hope the initiative’s opponents will remember to talk about pain and suffering, the strengthening of the middle class, how important quality education is, and putting our money where our mouth is.
I wish we’d honestly work to reduce the number of abortions while we still work to protect women. We could start by providing our youth with proper education, ensuring there is easy access to birth control, and providing help to struggling families.
A h/t to Dave Mindeman for bringing this initiative to my attention.

QUERY : With the ongoing effort to challenge the birthright citizenship of persons born of parents that are not birthright citizens and the challenges concerning immigration status, how does Mississippi proposed definition fit in ? (Proposed definition : “The term ‘person’ or ‘persons’ shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof.”)
Regarding your suggestion, the Republican leadership has already addressed that. Mississippi’s Lieutenant Governor Phil Bryan said in expressing his support for this citizen initiative “It is not the responsibility of the government if you have a child out of wedlock to make sure that all of your needs are taken care of from the cradle to the grave”. The Republican leader went on to say that Christianity does not recognize civil rights, only “natural” rights.
Remember that Mississippi has one of the highest child poverty rates in the country, and has some of the worst education statistics in the nation. In 2009, the Center for Disease Control reported that in 2006, Mississippi led the nation in teen pregnancies.
The group behind this effort is petitioning Minnesota legislators … and Wisconsin State Representative Andre Jacque has begun circulating a state constitutional personhood amendment for co-sponsorship. The Wisconsin Personhood Amendment would provide that the equal and inherent right to life is applied “to every human being at any stage of development.”
Hi Mac,
Around here someone has that Republican bumper sticker which says, “Can’t feed ‘em, don’t breed ‘em.”
Christians against abortion should want to help families in need instead of using the non-Jesus type of thinking, which is: “You get what you deserve.” Jesus is for “Love one another” and told parables about Good Samaritans.
Applying “to every human being at any stage of development” means no more living will? What about sending our boys and girls to die in war?
Do we protect the life of the woman, or the child, if a choice has to be made? They both die, apparently.
But I’m getting sidetracked. The idea of passing life at fertilization will especially hurt less affluent women, further widening the gap between the middle class and the rich. That’ll probably be the greatest effect. Or do you think it will greatly reduce the number of abortions? It’s my personal opinion that the affluent will find a way to have the abortion.
do you think it will greatly reduce the number of abortions? It’s my personal opinion that the affluent will find a way to have the abortion.
Prior to Rove-v-Wade, it was up to the states to decide … thus it became business for some states …
Your point is on target … the focus should be on reducing the need for abortions.
Dear Holley, I am trying to promote my facebook page. I am against this thing for a very personal reason. Implementation and adhearance to the letter of the law would make my wife dead and my two children not exist. My son is 21 and daughter 16, neither one of them knew their mother had an abortion to save her live prior to their birth. These things are not talked about and had not been mentioned in our home for over 20 years. It is not shame, it is a very emotional and private subject. I expect 80-90% of the poplulation have no idea that 1 in 20 women will have an abortion for the health of the mother in her lifetime. http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Initiative-26/277529792287948?sk=wall
Hi Charles, thank you for your FB page information! I’ll share it on my wall. I’m glad your wife made it. For years I’ve thought we should talk about the “life of a woman” when talking about abortion. Yes, an emotional and private situation.
Thank you and sorry I spelled your name wrong.
Hi Charles! The initiative didn’t pass! What about that.
It was a lot of good people who became aware of what the real consequences might have been. A big thanks to all that helped.