“I am happy to announce Senator Coleman as an adviser to my campaign. His advice will be critical as I lay out my vision for improving our economy at home and strengthening our partnerships around the world.”
– Mitt Romney 9/21/2011 Press Release
“It’s a new world and how it plays out, I’m not sure.”
– former Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman commenting on the creation of the Congressional Leadership Fund.
Highlights from the story :
The Congressional Leadership Fund has yet to file any paperwork detailing its fundraising or spending with the Federal Election Commission. Coleman said he doesn’t know how much money the group will raise.
Given Coleman’s track record, it could be tens of millions of dollars.
During the 2010 campaign, Coleman ran a group he founded called the American Action Network that raised more than $30 million and spent $26 million on ads favoring Republican congressional candidates.
That kind of money could have an enormous affect on House races across the country, especially in a year when House Republicans will likely be playing defense, said Paul Ryan, a lawyer with the Campaign Legal Center, a group that advocates for stricter limits on money in politics.
“It doesn’t take as much money to make a difference in a House race,” Ryan said. “A super PAC can come into a House race and spend a couple of million dollars and have that be a very, very significant piece of the total spending in that race and have a very big influence on voters.”
Hmmm … Norm Coleman, who has already headlined a fundraiser for Raymond Cravaack (R-MN-08) (who not surprisingly received a donation from Mitt Romney’s Free and Strong America PAC), while Coleman’s American Action Network (AAN) PAC purchased ads last year in the Duluth News Tribune supporting Mr. Cravaack.
Mr. Coleman’s American Action Network had its impact in the 2010 elections targeting Tim Walz (D-MN-01) and prompting a review of then Senator Coleman’s statements about the role of PAC and his plea that “Enough is Enough.”
Meanwhile, Representative Walz is already under attack … as the Mankato Free Press reported criticism of
“Walz for holding “jobs and the economy hostage by refusing to support the Keystone XL pipeline.”
That topic was also the theme of automated phone calls sponsored by national Republicans to southern Minnesotans last month, although it’s a somewhat confusing line of attack because Walz was one of 10 House Democrats to vote for a Republican proposal.
Hmmm … Norm Coleman is an advisor to Mitt Romney,
Norm Coleman heads-up a PAC that supports Republicans for the House,
Mitt Romney’s PAC gives money to Republican House member’s re-elections,
Norm Coleman’s PAC targets Democrats providing shady information …
Wow …
by losing his Senate seat, Norm Coleman is more influential today (and I will be a whole lot richer) without any responsibilities to the public.
And obviously NO co-ordination between the PAC and the Advisor … Yep, only in a Citizen’s United Corporate World.

Norm seems to lack in so many ways. Another case for election reform.
Hi Holly,
Thanks for adding your thoughts.
Nationally, people are beginning to see the problem (talk to people in Ohio who experienced the “mailbox/tv attack” during last November’s repeal of the Governor Kasich’s union restricting law, or the Romney dump in Iowa on Gingrich and then the Gingrich’s Winning Our Future attack on Romney in South Carolina).
But now, Minnesotans must begin to question the MN-GOP practices. When Dave Thompson is paid as a Media Consultant (at least $1,500 for Lee Byberg’s MN-07 Congressional campaign and $70,000 for other media consulting work for the state party) yet at the same time is candidate himself … if makes you wonder what “deliverable” he provided — or was this a way to move money to him.
Best regards,
Mac Hall
Funny the things I can catch in the main stream of Twitter, but long ago I read Thompson’s tweet saying he hoped he’d be hired. He’s not all that good at messaging… but maybe he’s good at “delivering”. We need election reform and a personhood amendment. And the SOTU seems biased.
oops, not a “personhood” amendment as it was defined in Mississippi.
It’s interesting how these deep topics are being defined. My daughter just attended a “freedom” event, which was a Christian, “anti-slavery” event. I notice she used right-wing talking points to describe trafficking, and I believe she now has ideas when she hears those talking points used elsewhere.
I read about a personhood amendment in response to corporations as people, forgot about Mississippi and fertilization, and called for a personhood amendment.
People tweet and comment about tossing the 14th Amendment. Modern interpretation of the law is having an effect on campaign spending, and this is happening the same time as a call for more state rights (v federal) rights (who can marry is just one of the topics where this is relevant discussion). Never mind that there are racial undertones in an argument to toss the 14th amendment.
Some entity is very good at weaving and intertwining. sometimes even different “sides” are calling for the same thing (but for very different reasons, and it’s the left that will hurt by an end result in the long run). Can the two year old Citizens United be that effective? The Heritage Foundation? Minnesota Majority is my least favorite, local version of this type of manipulation. This is massive manipulation which is effectively using social media.
[...] to retain the House, Raymond Cravaack needs support … and Norm Coleman has already held a fundraiser for him and paid for print [...]